“What Kind of Guy’s Going to Date a Vegan?” The Follow Up

by Gena on February 23, 2011

Wow! Huge discussion on yesterday’s post! I certainly didn’t expect to strike so many nerves, or spark so much debate, but I’m glad as always to have prompted a discussion. For those of you who didn’t read the post yet, I encourage you to check it out—along with the comments. I went back this morning and responded to a lot of individual commenters, but I did want to take a moment today to clarify a couple of point and to respond to a few commenters—generally and specifically.

OK, first up:

It didn’t occur to me to mention in my post that Appleby may never have uttered the words that Shook claims she did (“On our first date, I was like, ‘Hey, why’d you stop being a vegan?’ And she was like, ‘What kind of guy’s going to date a vegan?’ And I was like, ‘You’re awesome.’”) I think I took it for granted that the comment is obviously hearsay, and of course it may be embellished or misconstrued (especially since Shook doesn’t seem like the worthiest source, and clearly has an agenda of his own). For that reason, I should apologize to all of you, and I suppose to Appleby herself, for implying in my response that I automatically believe Shook’s account. I don’t, and I hope that, if Appleby didn’t say the words he says she did, she’ll come forward and correct the record with some thoughts of her own. I’d love to hear them!

But the fact that the exchange may or may not be accurately recollected doesn’t mean that the sentiment enclosed—that is, the comment “What kind of guy’s going to date a vegan?”—isn’t worthy of discussion. So I’d like you all to read my last post as if I was addressing the sentiment itself, not the speaker. I’m not making any sort of judgment about Appleby personally: in fact, if you like, strike her name from the post and pretend I’m speaking about an abstract, theoretical woman who’s on a date with a new guy. (I’ll even make a note in the post accordingly later today, because I think it’s important for us to talk about these issues and tensions freely, and without feeling as if we’re doing Appleby a disservice.)

OK, next point. A bunch of you pointed out that it’s very hard to become vegan or even to stay vegan, especially in the early years. One reader left a comment saying:

Veganism is not an easy road for most people. They fall off the wagon multiple times before they can retrain their eating habits and get over the associated social pressures. I know you must know this because of your own experience helping others. But these judgments are exactly the type of thing that discourage people from trying again.

I agree wholeheartedly that the transition isn’t easy. I flirted with veganism for over two years before I embraced it, so I know very well how bumpy (albeit rewarding) the road can be. In fact, I often find myself advising clients either to slow down their transition, or temporarily retain some animal foods, simply because I’ve seen time and time again that the process is hard. As a counselor, I weigh my clients’ happiness along with my desire to help them go vegan. I’m not unaware of the fact that sometimes, it’s alright to work toward veganism slowly, or even to postpone one’s journey if other personal priorities intervene.

It’s important to note, though, that Appleby’s alleged sentiment wasn’t that veganism had presented her with health challenges, or emotional challenges, or even widespread social challenges. The sentiment was very specific: it was that she didn’t think anyone would date her if she stayed a vegan.

Now, this is a challenge like any other that might present itself to a new vegan, and, as my friend Kathleen pointed out, any challenge to the vegan transition deserves to be addressed. But the whole point of my post was, in fact, to address it—albeit with a touch of exasperation. Worrying about one’s dating life is a perfectly legitimate reason to feel anxious about going (or staying) vegan. But my intention was to say that it is possible to find men (or women) who are open to different lifestyles—veganism included. And if you feel you don’t have a right to expect that much from a potential mate, it’s worth raising your expectations. I’m not making a broad claim that anyone who strays from the vegan path—regardless of the reason—is undeserving of sympathy and encouragement. I’m responding to a very specific reason for giving veganism up, and I’m responding with a message that I hope is empowering, which is that, in a truly loving and respectful relationship, there is room for independent thinking.

I think it’s also important to point out that, while we all sympathize and support those who encounter challenges as vegans, and while we all want to be respectful of those with views different from our own, there is nothing wrong with being steadfast and firm in one’s beliefs, either. Part of being vegan means courageously accepting the challenges it presents. To the reader who asked me, “Where’s all the love for sentiments like “do what’s best for you” and “don’t be a preachy vegan/vegetarian/human being?” I would say, all of those sentiments are really important. But so, too, are sentiments such as “don’t be afraid to stand by your convictions, even when they don’t make you popular.”

Moving on. A lot of readers pointed out that it seems acceptable for women to brag about how they got their boyfriends to stop eating meat, but that we all jump to our defenses if a woman says she started eating meat for a man. For the record, I don’t think it’s any more fair for a woman to try to force her partner to change his habits than it is for a man to force his habits on a woman. In ten years of adult life, I’ve never once gone on a mission to change the way a man eats, nor would I. That behavior would be no different from a man telling me that he refuses to respect my veganism. I think it’s absolutely fair to seek out prospective mates with likeminded views on food—that is, for vegans and omnis who feel strongly about dating other vegans and omnis to look for partners accordingly–but I don’t think it’s fair to meet a person who has views of his or her own, and then go on a campaign to discourage them.

A few of you noted that it’s natural for couples to shift their eating habits to accommodate each other: for instance, for a husband to clear his pantry of glutenous foods for a wife with Celiac. This is true, and I think that these sorts of accommodations are important: I certainly alter my eating habits in various ways when I’m around M! But I think that there’s a massive difference between avoiding gluten and abandoning veganism—at least if the veganism was for ethical reasons. One is a lifestyle change, and the other is a compromise or shift in beliefs. Extending this, one reader wrote:

Would anyone have cared as much if he said that she moved to a new state for him? Maybe picked up one of his hobbies so they could spend more time together?

I have to respectfully disagree that moving states or taking on a new hobby is the same as letting go of veganism—once again, assuming that the veganism had something to do with ethics. If it did, it reflected core values and beliefs: letting go of these values is quite different from learning how to ski, or taking guitar lessons. In my mind, it isn’t unlike shifting religious views or political views in order to accommodate a partner. If a person chooses to do just that, it’s his or her choice, but the point of my post was to say that it is possible for differing views and beliefs to exist harmoniously within a relationship: there’s no need to assume you have to drop or modify yours in order to find love.

Related to this—the topic of accommodation and adaption in relationships—a few readers noted that what was particularly perplexing about the sentiment was that it didn’t address a particular relationship, but rather a set of broad anxieties. One reader noted:

The part of this that really gets me is (it sounds like) she didn’t even change *for him*. It seems like she decided to stop being vegan because some guy some where wouldn’t like it, and that was the guy she wanted to be with. That part doesn’t make any sense at all!

I agree. Relationships are complicated and nuanced, and it’s hard for any of us to predict how we’ll adapt when we’re truly building a life with someone we love. But there’s a difference between modifying core beliefs (or even lifestyle habits) over the course of time with a life partner, and preemptively modifying them in the hopes that one will be more attractive and desirable.

One comment that I found particularly impressive amidst the many thoughtful remarks was this one:

There ARE men, and women, who do not see veganism as socially compatible or appropriate, and I think increased awareness and insight allow these people to become an increasingly reduced part of our population. To let them get us ANGRY though, and dwell on being irritated with the existance of such people or relationships seems to be a rather wasted use of our emotional resources. People are like that. They are changing because people are becoming more aware and veganism is becoming more mainstream etc. etc. Should we become irate at each encounter with such people, or just acknowledge their existence, remember that times are changing and we are a part of that change, and maybe allow a fleeting thought of whether such compromises are really conducive to a lasting, quality, relationship, then offer them a delicious vegan goody or something…..I guess I’m just saying that getting irritated and surprised by a varietal of human opinion is surprising.

I loved this, especially that last line, which is truly wise. And I couldn’t agree more that the offering of gooey vegan cookie will be far more effective and worthwhile than vitriol. The only counterargument I’d offer is that, while it’s fruitless to fret about the variety of human opinion and behavior, discussing human opinion and behavior makes life a lot more interesting—as these comments make abundantly clear! As long as we do it with respect, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with using specific scenarios to broach larger topics and debates.

And for the record, while I like my comments section always to be respectful, intelligent, and calm, I do want to say that I don’t think it’s fair to jump down a commenter’s throat simply because he or she was being sanguine. Compassion, empathy, and reasonableness are important. But so are strong opinions, and passionate views.

Finally, I think my favorite comment of the morning was from Katie, who said:

I love the Choosing Raw debates. And I think this one is especially interesting, as it’s obviously touching quite a few buttons. While I don’t think us vegans should be judgmental, particularly when someone gives up veganism for unknown reasons, it’s a shame when we back down from our views out of this fear that the stereotype (judgmental vegan) will be true. Plus, one the most important pieces of Shook’s quote and possibly Appleby’s actions (though clearly we can’t be sure), is the idea that veganism is inherently feminine, just a frivolous thing that girls do to lose weight. Health and weight loss may be benefits of veganism, along with the eventual PETA ad if you’re a celeb, but veganism is about the ethical choices we make when we eat. I’d say that’s more about being a conscious human that it is about being a man or a woman. And that’s something worth getting fired up over.

Thanks for bringing us this great debate, Gena!

Quite right, Katie. Honestly, guys, I can’t thank you all enough for being so smart, so full of opinions, so quick to challenge me, so quick to make me reconsider and widen my own perspectives. Blogging is a joy for me in every way, but these kinds of conversations are—at least for me—the absolute highlight. I am so, so lucky to engage in conversations with all of you. Thanks.

I was going to share an awesome new raw and vegan entrée today, but I think we’ve had quite enough talk for one day. So instead, I’ll just give you a quick snapshot of a quick and easy raw lunch. Who here is a fan of my cheesy parsnip spread? It’s one of my favorites—especially great for those who can’t tolerate tree nuts or beans—and I polished off a batch today stuffed into some boston lettuce leaves and topped with a sprinkling of shredded apple and sliced avocado:

IMG_5059 (575x383)

IMG_5069 (575x383)

Semi raw, all vegan, and absolutely simple and divine.

See you guys tomorrow!

xo

Print Friendly

{ 26 comments… read them below or add one }

Averie (LoveVeggiesAndYoga) February 23, 2011 at 3:25 pm

Wow….deep thoughts, Gena!

There are so many things that I could touch on but I do agree that there’s a double standard with women being praised for helping our men to eat more plant-based but that if a man encouraged his girlfriend/wife to eat more meat, and she did, that they both would be vilified (a bit). So yes, it’s true that the double standard exists, at least in my experience.

Couples shifting their eating habits though as a natural progression…that is what has happened in our house over the past decade. We are not changing “for” each other; and I have changed on my own path, more plant based, gluten free, less processed foods, and b/c I do the cooking and groc shopping, my hubs and child by default end up more on my path. They’re not complaining and in fact are happy, so there’s been a shift naturally for all of us, which has been great.

Gosh, I loved the posts both yesterday and today and could write so much.

Thank you for the follow up, for fleshing out your ideas more and for highlighting some of the comments. Lots of food for thought :)

Reply

Maryea @ Happy Healthy Mama February 23, 2011 at 3:27 pm

Great response to all the debate, Gena! I don’t have time to comment now but just wanted to let you know that I enjoyed this post.

Reply

Lauren @ TheRawCure February 23, 2011 at 3:50 pm

“In ten years of adult life, I’ve never once gone on a mission to change the way a man eats, nor would I.”

Thank you. I become frustrated with friends and family that automatically talk about themselves when they mention my veganism or find out about my thoughts on it. It’s my belief, my ethic, I’m not forcing it on anyone. I love how you talk about how it would be the same if you did the same to them. Perfect. Yes, I completely agree.

Thank you again.

Reply

bitt February 23, 2011 at 4:42 pm

Reading the comments and your post today, it reminds me of a time when I was “just” vegetarian but also wheat-free and a boyfriend broke up with me–partly because of my diet. And then as I got more radical with thoughts on animal rights, another boyfriend0who was vegetarian–broke up with me because I cared too much (he wanted me to be more apathetic I guess). Those comments made me seek out a partner who would support that aspect of my life because it was so important to me.

I also want to say that I DO try to change people’s diets towards more plant based if I can. But it’s because I care about them and want them to be healthy. Everytime I read something like how meat causes cancer I think of my loved ones who still eat meat and wish I could get that message to them. I don’t really see it as the same as a person who “just likes meat” getting their loves ones to enjoy BBQ with them. For me, it’s because I have deep compassion for both the humans and animals involved.

Reply

hippierunner February 23, 2011 at 5:20 pm

Same here about encouraging loved ones to change their diet to a more plant-based one. In fact, I always find it so puzzling that anyone wouldn’t! I can’t help but to try to get those around me to eat more healthfully, because I care for them so much! I am glad you said this because I am so accustomed to hearing how we should let people make their own decisions free of influence- that is something I cannot fathom doing as I simply want the best for those I care about.

Reply

Gena February 23, 2011 at 8:09 pm

B,

Very good point — it’s one thing to pressure someone to eat differently because it’s conveniant for us, but another to do it out of concern. I’ve gently urged my Mom, who is a breast cancer survivor, to eat less dairy, and I’m glad I have. I think it’s a case by case thing.

G

Reply

Valerie @ City|Life|Eats February 23, 2011 at 4:52 pm

What a great follow-up post. It made me think further about how I handle my diet versus my husband’s – I definitely default towards meal planning according to my tastes than his, which I feel can be unfair, but he often cooks meat as an add-on to our meals.

Reply

Christine (The Raw Project) February 23, 2011 at 4:54 pm

Another great post, Gena! True that veganism is a tough road and I flirted with it for 8 months before transitioning and still find some of the criticism I get about it hard. Great points on being equally accepting of your mates eating habits as they are of yours, I’m lucky my hubby has been very accepting of my veganism even though he’s not.

Reply

Hannah February 23, 2011 at 6:27 pm

I think it’s so wonderful that you take the time to bring together the various ideas (and respond to your readers’ comments) that arise from some of the issues (that doesn’t feel like the right word, but you catch mydrift) you bring up here. It signals a lovely level of respect. Thanks Gena!

Reply

Melomeals: Vegan for $3.33 a Day February 23, 2011 at 6:30 pm

Great response! It is diffucult to stand yup for what you believe in sometimes

Reply

Joanna February 23, 2011 at 6:43 pm

Someone once told me, that getting a person to change his/her eating habits is like getting him/her to change religious beliefs. I would have to agree. Having said that, the woman in question had some self esteem issues and perhaps was eager to give up her convictions simply because some guy paid attention to her. So sad. Veganism was probably just a fad for her. Early stages of veganism (as I’m finding out) are difficult and we often slip into our old eating habits. Hopefully young people who read that article don’t think they have to follow her path to keep a partner.

Reply

Katelyn @ Chef Katelyn February 23, 2011 at 7:13 pm

I absolutely love these debates! Moving to another state for a guy is NOT the same thing as compromising your values. I absolutely believe that veganism should not be imposed, compromised, or expected. It is something as deep as religion, morals, values; it is a strong belief, and much more than skin-deep.

Reply

Ian February 23, 2011 at 7:38 pm

I can’t believe the day I couldn’t devote time to read the few blogs I follow yielded such an amazing series of comments! I think that’s why this blog is so amazing: it fosters a great community that isn’t afraid of debate and is always an enlightening source of information. Thanks Gena :) & all commenters

Reply

melissa February 23, 2011 at 9:24 pm

I love how you incorporated the comments and opinions into this post. It really shows how much you care about the topic, your readers, and furthering discussions around veganism.

Reply

Jess - The Domestic Vegan February 23, 2011 at 9:37 pm

Dang, I miss reading your blog for two days & miss all this?! :D I better go catch up on the comments from Part 1.

I agree with Ian & Melissa (and so many others). It’s really fantastic how much you care about everyone’s input on various topics. I love the discussions that arise, and your responses to the feedback is always so spot on! <3

Reply

Christin@purplebirdblog February 23, 2011 at 11:44 pm

Love these incredibly deep reads!

Reply

pure2raw twins February 24, 2011 at 7:31 am

Just got caught up on everything and great discussion. I feel people judge even when they do not mean it; we get judge,etc for eating raw foods even from people we thought were our friends and “aren’t” supposed to judge. I wish it would just end, but know it won’t. I think people are so quick to take one side, like saying women are more likely to be vegan. And I agree with others that there is a double standard. Tough issue with so many sides to it! Great posts :)

Reply

Kathleen February 24, 2011 at 7:52 am

Beautiful and thoughtful follow-up, my friend.

Reply

Lia February 24, 2011 at 9:55 am

I really appreciated the follow up here. I most agree with the correlation between asking people to change their religious views and asking them to change their ethically based veganism, or any other choices based on beliefs and values. Cheers!

Reply

Samantha @ Health, Happiness & Skinny Jeans February 24, 2011 at 10:14 am

Wow, what an interesting conversation. I am not a vegan but if I were I would expect that my partner respect that about me as a personaly choice that is not up for debate. I can’t understand how someone could change their belief for someone else; either you believe it or you don’t. And in my opinion no one that is worth it would ever want or expect their partner to make that choice. Its definitely not a bad thing if fewer people want to date vegans because it saves them time from dating people who aren’t worht it in my opinion.

Reply

Bryant February 24, 2011 at 1:12 pm

Thank you, Gena, for such a thoughtful, intelligent and bold post. I really appreciate your perspective. I particularly appreciated: “And if you feel you don’t have a right to expect that much from a potential mate, it’s worth raising your expectations.” This is difficult for many women (and men), but so necessary in building healthy self esteem and relationships.

Reply

Hoshigaki February 24, 2011 at 3:14 pm

I just got back from an NYC trip (Angelica’s Kitchen, Quintessence- lots of East Village) to find this initially disappointing but nonetheless, interesting discussion. I was disappointed, or frustrated rather, by the need for whatever reason to obsess about minute points of a debate rather than the overarching issue. I’ve found, when broaching controversial topics, that we, a lot of the time seem to focus on the exception rather than the rule. Like, “well, I knew a vegan girl who almost died so why are we talking about this?”

On the technicality regarding whether or not the quote was viable: it wasn’t the main issue and shouldn’t have been the focus. I’m glad you saw that as such Gena and addressed it in your follow-up.
The real focus is the message the quote was sending. And what the implications of that message have for us as veg-women and veg-men.

Concerning the article, I thought it was MORE annoying that the message these young starlets are sending is that they are SUPER-HUMAN. That women on film DON’T need to eat healthfully and exercise in order to look as good as they do.
*Why is it such a faux pas to abstain from eating giant hamburgers or unsharable portions of deep fried eggs benedict for just the simple reason that you don’t want to do that to your body (health, animal-justice related all there)?*
Seriously, are you really NO FUN because you want to feel good in the morning? Even in Shape and Fitness those gals are quick to tell us what their junk food favorites are. Like, “you eat Twinkies. Guess what, that doesn’t endear you to the thinking person one bit.”
Essentially, the quote is saying…vegan = not fun, not sexy. So I can’t be a not fun girl. I have to order big portions, finish it all and somehow never poop out all of that nastiness because I’m a girl and we don’t do that, yadda yadda.
Caring about your health, the health of the planet, the health of critters big and small = not fun.
I feel like guys absorb this sh*t. I think they want “a girl who eats”…in fact, I’ve heard this before. I want a tiny little girl like (insert name of actress here) that eats like (insert name of line-backer here) they say.

Lately I’ve been really frustrated with the way MEN are portrayed as so emotionally and ethically uncomplicated with homogeneous “male” desires that exclude following their own beliefs or respecting those of their partners (at least when it comes to food! But also sex!). This portion of the article seems to do just this and that is disconcerting.

“Le Sigh”.

Reply

Gena February 25, 2011 at 2:32 pm

I have to agree with you about the uproar over the possibility that she was misquoted. I mean, of course that’s possible. I don’t think that was particularly relevant to our conversation about the comment; it’s simply a margin of error that exists anytime we talk about anything we read in print. I’m glad that everyone was at their compassionate best, and quick to sympathize with Appleby, and thus defend her, but come on: the fact that Shook may have misquoted his girlfriend was hardly relevant to the essence of what I was saying, which didn’t have all that much to do with Appleby.

Reply

@DrSeale February 26, 2011 at 8:47 am

I know I’m late to the game with my comment, but I can’t help but point out that in all of the lively debate no one has answered the question the last two blogs have posed – “What kind of guy is going to date a vegan?” As a guy, one who happens to also be vegan and who’s married to a vegan wife, let me take a shot at giving an answer to the question. It will be a guy attracted to a woman who is more than likely to be vibrant mentally, emotionally, and physically; has a deeper compassion for living beings ( including men) than her omnivorous counterparts; is in touch with ecology and cares about our planet; realizes the health benefits of veganism and is enjoying those benefits; is probably at the top of the sensuality scale (and not just in regard to food); and last, but certainly not least, more than likely is very attractive physically as a result of her lifestyle. It befuddles me why any man would not recognize the fact that a woman following a vegan lifestyle makes a very desirable partner in every arena. But to reject a desireable woman because of the way she eats? That’s just illogical and shows how deeply imbedded the issue of food has become within the human psyche.

Reply

healthy ashley March 5, 2011 at 5:00 pm

I love this discussion. I brought it up on my blog a while back and couldn’t believe how varied the responses to it were! I went on a lot of dates while being vegan and I enjoyed playing a game of not mentioning it unless they asked. It was fun proving that it’s not at all as high-maintenance as many believe it has to be.

Reply

Lisa March 13, 2011 at 10:58 am

Gena,

I don’t want to put you up on a pedestal as the rational voice of veganism, but I admit that I kind of think of you (ok, your blog, since I don’t actually know you) as such.

A little bit of background. I originally saw the Shiri Appleby piece and didn’t think too much of it, but in retrospect I agree with your and many of the other commentators’ comments. It is basically ridiculous and trivializing.

However, I’m not a vegan. I love vegetarian and vegan cuisine – well, to be clear, I love all good food, and I’m especially fond of plants in general. In the past I’ve leaned towards more vegetarian and vegan food at home, but recently I’ve actually been eating more meat for various reasons. I’ve always loved your blog, the food you make and your writing style, and I generally believe that if meat eaters just add more vegetarian and vegan meals to their lives the overall benefit to health and to the planet would be huge.

However, I also believe quite sincerely that it is very difficult to be both *healthy* and vegan. That’s one of the big things that you generally address in your blog that makes me so interested in what you have to say – you’re very realistic about getting enough nutrition, and it doesn’t seem like you are filling up on vegan cupcakes and other empty carbs and sugar, which is where I think many people go wrong.

Why am I writing now? I had a really, really strange thing happen to me yesterday, and I couldn’t help but think about you and your blog. I went to a taco truck down the street from me for lunch, and tried to order two carne asada tacos. As I’m standing there waiting to order, two guys behind me are loudly discussing how horrible meat is and how eating meat is disgusting. Loud, obnoxious, self-aggrandizing conversation – in the line at a taco truck that primarily serves not only the standard types of meat but also tongue and tripe. It continues and continues – and keep in mind, I live in a city with a number of vegetarian and vegan restaurants – in SF we have everything from Millennium to Gracias Madre, a vegan Mexican restaurant. Finally, I turn around and ask them to have their conversation somewhere else. I was immediately verbally attacked for the next 10 minutes by one of the guys, who called me everything from “normal and expendable” and went off on how horrible I was, etc.

Obviously he was seriously disturbed, but more than that I was really, really confused as to why he was getting a taco there when there were so many other options. The best part was when he compared the strife of vegans to that of African Americans fighting against Jim Crow laws. That, I would say, is going too far.

At any rate, in any big city one is bound to have a few interactions with the crazy, it’s just part of the game. However, I was really disturbed by the attack, because I would never dream to tell someone how they can or should eat. Leading by example, as you, Gena, do – is much more valuable over time. Your example, your writing, and your food makes me much more likely to eat more vegetarian and vegan food than some crazy, horrible person who thinks it’s OK to verbally attack a stranger in public and is also apparently completely comfortable with raging hypocrisy.

I’ve been going on for a long time, but I just wanted to encourage you (not that you need my encouragement!) to continue with your positive message, great recipes and openness to debate.

Thanks Gena – I really like what you put out there.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: